Where were we?
After three weeks of vacation I should point out, for future reference, a pair of events which is read in the national press to avoid being lost in time. The Vatican
, spurred by an investigation of the weekly Panorama, has confirmed its condemnation of homosexuality, explicitly inviting the priests who practice to dispose of the cassock.
It seems to me a coherent and positive attitude .
A free association, as we agnostics need to consider the Church (unlike, of course, the approach of Friends Christian Practitioners) must be able to choose their bosses' behavior and asking them costumes accordance with the principles of the association.
We can not be in spite of the saints in heaven says a popular proverb and the permanence of homosexual priests in the Church or in any other association that requires consistent behavior can not be tolerated.
I hope that the Vatican has in practice resulting its proper theoretical approach and I also hope that for the positions paid with public money is imposed on the morality of declaring themselves to enabling citizens to make informed choices cause.
The other story that has had the honor has been in the news in some newspapers under the heading " The Piave line .
This is the decision of the Mayor a country in Treviso to collect bipartisan cry of disgust " from various citizens, tired of seeing the presence a beach on the banks of the dear homeland Noble River, Same-sex that rub against each other.
The mayor is not a Northern League, but one of the pci / pds / ds / pd and I reconciled, in part, with the historic enemies of the Communists.
In this regard I would an old joke that runs in Bologna ... but keep it for times when hiding news from comment. Who knows what the right
reaction to the excesses of recent years does not begin to blow harder and harder, even if, in other latitudes, we read of a local magistrate ( that will surely be proven wrong by the Supreme Court ) had the audacity to consider void the ban on unions (?) enshrined in the homosexual people of California with a referendum .
usual, there is someone who is expected to exceed the next and, not knowing what it means democracy, seeks to impose its own vision .
Such behavior not only irritate the majority who had voted democratically in a way that will not make stronger reaction that, at that point, will, if possible, even more legitimate .
After three weeks of vacation I should point out, for future reference, a pair of events which is read in the national press to avoid being lost in time. The Vatican
, spurred by an investigation of the weekly Panorama, has confirmed its condemnation of homosexuality, explicitly inviting the priests who practice to dispose of the cassock.
It seems to me a coherent and positive attitude .
A free association, as we agnostics need to consider the Church (unlike, of course, the approach of Friends Christian Practitioners) must be able to choose their bosses' behavior and asking them costumes accordance with the principles of the association.
We can not be in spite of the saints in heaven says a popular proverb and the permanence of homosexual priests in the Church or in any other association that requires consistent behavior can not be tolerated.
I hope that the Vatican has in practice resulting its proper theoretical approach and I also hope that for the positions paid with public money is imposed on the morality of declaring themselves to enabling citizens to make informed choices cause.
The other story that has had the honor has been in the news in some newspapers under the heading " The Piave line .
This is the decision of the Mayor a country in Treviso to collect bipartisan cry of disgust " from various citizens, tired of seeing the presence a beach on the banks of the dear homeland Noble River, Same-sex that rub against each other.
The mayor is not a Northern League, but one of the pci / pds / ds / pd and I reconciled, in part, with the historic enemies of the Communists.
In this regard I would an old joke that runs in Bologna ... but keep it for times when hiding news from comment. Who knows what the right
reaction to the excesses of recent years does not begin to blow harder and harder, even if, in other latitudes, we read of a local magistrate ( that will surely be proven wrong by the Supreme Court ) had the audacity to consider void the ban on unions (?) enshrined in the homosexual people of California with a referendum .
usual, there is someone who is expected to exceed the next and, not knowing what it means democracy, seeks to impose its own vision .
Such behavior not only irritate the majority who had voted democratically in a way that will not make stronger reaction that, at that point, will, if possible, even more legitimate .
Log it
0 comments:
Post a Comment