Anyone who knows me knows that television is for me only movies and TV shows (mostly recorded or on DVD), television news and matches of Bologna and National. For those
talk, sometimes boring, more interesting, but always indicative of the temperature of our society prefer the radio which allows me to listen, reflect, to focus if the subject is interesting, to continue to do more if the theme is not teases me, besides being always a company when you drive, like when you read.
So among the many programs that I happened to listen to and I quote, about the topic of this blog , that on a radio at 12.30 pm on Thursday the 18th (or Wednesday 17th) February.
I was surprised (and disgusted , indeed: just disgusted , it is still permissible to externalize this feeling! ) from what I heard.
E ' addressed the issue of homosexuality in boys , taking a cue from that ridiculous manual on "how to teach" the children of homosexual (a term still wrong, because can not exist in nature children of homosexual couples, while it is wrong mention these guys as "children of gay" if a parent becomes so).
brackets.
If you put in writing a "manual" to teach "children of homosexuals," seems to me an explicit admission that homosexuals are considered different for learning reading, writing, arithmetic (in school only because this matter, not more) for "their" children. In the transmission
guests were (needless to say) three people "lined up and covered" on the same line of "normality" of homosexuality , cloaked by the new term " recognition of their sexual identity." There was a guy
Arcigay, one of Agedo (Which I found to be Association of Parents of homosexuals) and a psychologist.
The transmission has been developed (without contradictory) on the usual, hackneyed, binary fight against alleged "homophobia" and should be conducted with law enforcement Mancino ( sic ) and with a school education that teaches not to be considered "different" homosexuals.
Apart from the fact that I would be very angry if schools address moral issues in a manner contrary to my teachings (Family is that it is to educate children about these topics, the school must serve, again, to teach reading, writing and arithmetic) the proposal of Arcigay guy (in addition to the repressive willingness to block, through the use of "Mancino" - and perhaps even more liberticide ad hoc - the free expression of ideas , thoughts and their spread, demonstrating that they believe so little in their argument that they need police repression to silence those who think like them ) has something Kafkaesque: introduce, in essence, a special course to understand the boys their "true" sexual identity .
I was reminded of the complaint that on several occasions (I believe on this blog) has made our distant friends about the propaganda in Canada have put in place the homosexual organizations infiltrating schools with the excuse to bring out "the sexual identity."
One way, which undoubtedly can influence the weakest (and we all know how teens are influenced) by emergence of a "sexual identity" constructive which in reality is just the imagination induced by similar conferences.
I hope that in Italy you will be able to put up with all their force, a further step towards this degradation, preventing it from creating a useless "chair of homosexuality" because up tali tematiche di carattere etico e morale solo la Famiglia ha il compito di educare, curare e crescere i propri ragazzi .
talk, sometimes boring, more interesting, but always indicative of the temperature of our society prefer the radio which allows me to listen, reflect, to focus if the subject is interesting, to continue to do more if the theme is not teases me, besides being always a company when you drive, like when you read.
So among the many programs that I happened to listen to and I quote, about the topic of this blog , that on a radio at 12.30 pm on Thursday the 18th (or Wednesday 17th) February.
I was surprised (and disgusted , indeed: just disgusted , it is still permissible to externalize this feeling! ) from what I heard.
E ' addressed the issue of homosexuality in boys , taking a cue from that ridiculous manual on "how to teach" the children of homosexual (a term still wrong, because can not exist in nature children of homosexual couples, while it is wrong mention these guys as "children of gay" if a parent becomes so).
brackets.
If you put in writing a "manual" to teach "children of homosexuals," seems to me an explicit admission that homosexuals are considered different for learning reading, writing, arithmetic (in school only because this matter, not more) for "their" children. In the transmission
guests were (needless to say) three people "lined up and covered" on the same line of "normality" of homosexuality , cloaked by the new term " recognition of their sexual identity." There was a guy
Arcigay, one of Agedo (Which I found to be Association of Parents of homosexuals) and a psychologist.
The transmission has been developed (without contradictory) on the usual, hackneyed, binary fight against alleged "homophobia" and should be conducted with law enforcement Mancino ( sic ) and with a school education that teaches not to be considered "different" homosexuals.
Apart from the fact that I would be very angry if schools address moral issues in a manner contrary to my teachings (Family is that it is to educate children about these topics, the school must serve, again, to teach reading, writing and arithmetic) the proposal of Arcigay guy (in addition to the repressive willingness to block, through the use of "Mancino" - and perhaps even more liberticide ad hoc - the free expression of ideas , thoughts and their spread, demonstrating that they believe so little in their argument that they need police repression to silence those who think like them ) has something Kafkaesque: introduce, in essence, a special course to understand the boys their "true" sexual identity .
I was reminded of the complaint that on several occasions (I believe on this blog) has made our distant friends about the propaganda in Canada have put in place the homosexual organizations infiltrating schools with the excuse to bring out "the sexual identity."
One way, which undoubtedly can influence the weakest (and we all know how teens are influenced) by emergence of a "sexual identity" constructive which in reality is just the imagination induced by similar conferences.
I hope that in Italy you will be able to put up with all their force, a further step towards this degradation, preventing it from creating a useless "chair of homosexuality" because up tali tematiche di carattere etico e morale solo la Famiglia ha il compito di educare, curare e crescere i propri ragazzi .
Entra ne
0 comments:
Post a Comment