Capezzone, former secretary radical past with Berlusconi in 2008, evidently not prepared to take more blows and dusts off his radical ideas are incompatible with the sentiment of the people right of center.
Here then rant after Premier expression for which is "better to look girls be gay" to get a law restricts freedoms to "punish" homophobia .
So, with the brilliant show of talented former pupil of panels, which Berlusconi has won votes with his outside if they go back to the League and Forza Nuova.
I do not believe that the law would punish homophobia ( and who decides, then, that it is homophobia, and who said it, however, that being against homosexuality is bad? ) as one that would stop to think and express ideas on events that affected the Jews during World War II, differing from the Vulgate endorsed by official sources, limited to haunt those who act violently and not only those who think or speak.
Se così fosse, se fosse solo una punizione per chi facesse mulinare i pugni, allora non ci sarebbe bisogno di alcuna legge ad hoc , ma sarebbe sufficiente applicare le norme contro la violenza privata che già esistono nel nostro codice penale.
No, la volontà è quella di conculcare ( anche se parlando di omosessualità sarebbe più appropriato un altro termine similare e assonante ) la libertà individuale e il sacrosanto diritto di pensarla e raccontarla come si vuole purchè non si passi alla violenza fisica.
Così, visto che la legge ancora non c'è e una norma penale non può avere valore retroattivo , I use my school, however, inalienable, to express my ideas. The reason
place to support such a freedom-aberration is the alleged discrimination that the alleged "homophobic" work towards homosexuals.
But it seems to you that homosexuals are discriminated against?
Where?
On television?
the cinema?
cultural context? In
work?
in politics?
Only with great imagination you can think that homosexuals are discriminated against in Italy. Rather
You do not think that we should be forced to vote for a homosexual or include one or more of their friends or invite them at home or maybe go to dinner with the obligation to "punch" at least once a month!
If homosexuality is repugnant to a should be perfectly free to refuse to take responsibility the presence of those who practice .
And this applies to private life as for the public in the sense that it would be appropriate that the "many" man in Parliament is declared, so let's see if the people then, in his infinite wisdom, they would vote again.
There is therefore no discrimination and the contrary, there is an excess nell'assecondarne whims , since we are talking about a law to silence the so-called "homophobic" how to legislate on their claims.
There is discrimination, but nourish it too, and as more and more favors somebody, the more it gets up his claims .
We reached the point where you plan to put additional fees for the obese, is necessary to refrain from smoking even outdoors, but nothing is done against homosexuality , rather it favors those who practice it. Then
understand why you want to impose a gag : trivial because these truths to be silenced and can not be to reflect and convey messages in contrast with those of the Taliban of political correctness.
They both victims, but they train to do the torturers .
do not know if that law passes. If this happens
we will all be less free, but our ideas can not be canceled because civil part of the heritage of humanity .
Here then rant after Premier expression for which is "better to look girls be gay" to get a law restricts freedoms to "punish" homophobia .
So, with the brilliant show of talented former pupil of panels, which Berlusconi has won votes with his outside if they go back to the League and Forza Nuova.
I do not believe that the law would punish homophobia ( and who decides, then, that it is homophobia, and who said it, however, that being against homosexuality is bad? ) as one that would stop to think and express ideas on events that affected the Jews during World War II, differing from the Vulgate endorsed by official sources, limited to haunt those who act violently and not only those who think or speak.
Se così fosse, se fosse solo una punizione per chi facesse mulinare i pugni, allora non ci sarebbe bisogno di alcuna legge ad hoc , ma sarebbe sufficiente applicare le norme contro la violenza privata che già esistono nel nostro codice penale.
No, la volontà è quella di conculcare ( anche se parlando di omosessualità sarebbe più appropriato un altro termine similare e assonante ) la libertà individuale e il sacrosanto diritto di pensarla e raccontarla come si vuole purchè non si passi alla violenza fisica.
Così, visto che la legge ancora non c'è e una norma penale non può avere valore retroattivo , I use my school, however, inalienable, to express my ideas. The reason
place to support such a freedom-aberration is the alleged discrimination that the alleged "homophobic" work towards homosexuals.
But it seems to you that homosexuals are discriminated against?
Where?
On television?
the cinema?
cultural context? In
work?
in politics?
Only with great imagination you can think that homosexuals are discriminated against in Italy. Rather
You do not think that we should be forced to vote for a homosexual or include one or more of their friends or invite them at home or maybe go to dinner with the obligation to "punch" at least once a month!
If homosexuality is repugnant to a should be perfectly free to refuse to take responsibility the presence of those who practice .
And this applies to private life as for the public in the sense that it would be appropriate that the "many" man in Parliament is declared, so let's see if the people then, in his infinite wisdom, they would vote again.
There is therefore no discrimination and the contrary, there is an excess nell'assecondarne whims , since we are talking about a law to silence the so-called "homophobic" how to legislate on their claims.
There is discrimination, but nourish it too, and as more and more favors somebody, the more it gets up his claims .
We reached the point where you plan to put additional fees for the obese, is necessary to refrain from smoking even outdoors, but nothing is done against homosexuality , rather it favors those who practice it. Then
understand why you want to impose a gag : trivial because these truths to be silenced and can not be to reflect and convey messages in contrast with those of the Taliban of political correctness.
They both victims, but they train to do the torturers .
do not know if that law passes. If this happens
we will all be less free, but our ideas can not be canceled because civil part of the heritage of humanity .
@
Log it
