I read a comment that complained about the lack of update this blog.
E ' true.
But this is a blog " goes alone ", at entrances and even with the tool made available by blogspot is" inclusion "as a fixed reader.
There are over 150 post from that June 9, 2007 (almost three years) when we opened this area of \u200b\u200bfreedom . In those places there are
comments on current events, but also reflections that you can draw today.
I write more, compatible with our commitments professional, since, unlike those loitering in community centers or in associations lobbying, we have and the profession, it may surprise some projects we are involved not only in time but also for the pleasure of achieving them.
What we can do, however, with a relative constancy, is resume news on the blog and Chios synthetically or, sometimes, left without comment, they are so clear.
1) General
An American general, during a congressional hearing, they blamed the presence of homosexuals in the military the responsibility of the Dutch inaction that would have prevented the massacre at Srebrenica.
course has been the offenses of homosexual lobbies and the Dutch. Of course, if the general had
claims to the contrary would have been praised as an example and open-minded and "politically correct".
limit ourselves to record their views, we hope that we should not get to the rebuttal.
2) Wisdom from parent
The Board of an Institute of places I can not remember which, has rejected the attempt to hold a school assembly in which representatives of an association would have to explain homosexuality children their drives.
The parents objected to this propaganda, putting the corner representatives of students and teachers.
I am convinced that among those parents ci siano anche quelli che votano “aperto” e “politicamente corretto” … quando si tratta di far ricadere le conseguenze sugli altri.
Ma quando il danno potenziale arriva in casa, allora tornano ad essere i genitori che tutti abbiamo conosciuto: protettivi e saggi.
3) Corte costituzionale
La corte costituzionale è stata chiamata a decidere se gli articoli del codice civile che consentono il matrimonio solo tra persone di sesso differente siano costituzionali.
La decisione è stata rinviata a dopo le elezioni regionali.
Una Nazione sana, un Popolo forte esprimerebbe una corte che non avrebbe bisogno one minute to dismiss the claims of homosexuals.
If two persons of the same sex is a fancy to play "husband and wife" do it in private, without demanding legal recognition, a stamp of the state and maybe even of all such contributions from the "reversibility" of any their pensions.
E ' true.
But this is a blog " goes alone ", at entrances and even with the tool made available by blogspot is" inclusion "as a fixed reader.
There are over 150 post from that June 9, 2007 (almost three years) when we opened this area of \u200b\u200bfreedom . In those places there are
comments on current events, but also reflections that you can draw today.
I write more, compatible with our commitments professional, since, unlike those loitering in community centers or in associations lobbying, we have and the profession, it may surprise some projects we are involved not only in time but also for the pleasure of achieving them.
What we can do, however, with a relative constancy, is resume news on the blog and Chios synthetically or, sometimes, left without comment, they are so clear.
1) General
An American general, during a congressional hearing, they blamed the presence of homosexuals in the military the responsibility of the Dutch inaction that would have prevented the massacre at Srebrenica.
course has been the offenses of homosexual lobbies and the Dutch. Of course, if the general had
claims to the contrary would have been praised as an example and open-minded and "politically correct".
limit ourselves to record their views, we hope that we should not get to the rebuttal.
2) Wisdom from parent
The Board of an Institute of places I can not remember which, has rejected the attempt to hold a school assembly in which representatives of an association would have to explain homosexuality children their drives.
The parents objected to this propaganda, putting the corner representatives of students and teachers.
I am convinced that among those parents ci siano anche quelli che votano “aperto” e “politicamente corretto” … quando si tratta di far ricadere le conseguenze sugli altri.
Ma quando il danno potenziale arriva in casa, allora tornano ad essere i genitori che tutti abbiamo conosciuto: protettivi e saggi.
3) Corte costituzionale
La corte costituzionale è stata chiamata a decidere se gli articoli del codice civile che consentono il matrimonio solo tra persone di sesso differente siano costituzionali.
La decisione è stata rinviata a dopo le elezioni regionali.
Una Nazione sana, un Popolo forte esprimerebbe una corte che non avrebbe bisogno one minute to dismiss the claims of homosexuals.
If two persons of the same sex is a fancy to play "husband and wife" do it in private, without demanding legal recognition, a stamp of the state and maybe even of all such contributions from the "reversibility" of any their pensions.
Log it
